Sunday, 24 May 2009
Collaboration publication
Sunday, 17 May 2009
Mel Bochner
Mel Bochner is another great conceptual artist whose perceptual conveyances of critical, philosophical theory inspire me greatly.
"Mel Bochner is considered a pioneer of the Post-Minimal and Conceptual art movements. He began making prints in the early 70's and printmaking has remained for him an essential medium for experimentation.
"Thought about systems, procedures, language -- about how we are able to know anything...cognitive strategies -- counting, measuring, stacking, or ordering" "He gradually moves on to equally basic investigations of the language of relationships: prepositions, verbs, and simple logical propositions. The questions he deals with in his conceptual works, like the materials he uses, are familiar to everyone - fundamental givens in our culture. But their surface simplicity masks a serious questioning of all systems of representation, both visual and verbal."
(Two Palms Press)
"Language is Not Transparent (1970), a text written out in chalk on a painted section of wall, and Bochner’s prepositional sculpture works from the same year are ambitious attempts to give visual form to Wittgensteinian logic. The difficulty with much of these works runs parallel to that of Wittgenstein’s statement that ‘It is difficult to know something and to act as if you did not know it.’
Bochner regularly asks the viewer to act as if they didn’t understand his logistic inquiries into objective truths. Much of his work comes across as pretentious and impenetrable when it is often obvious and simple."
Wednesday, 6 May 2009
Poem : Why I am still here
Why the fuck am I still here?
why the fuck am i still here?
why the fuck am i still here?
Im not sure.
Its not realising the problem of existence as an origin, thats fucking easy, science has answered that particular conundrum. but why the fuck am I still here?
Im drinking myself into a desperate sense of creativity, my own little escape.
A world inside a world, a fourth dimensional consciousness,
and I'm gazing wontedly at the sour cream and onion pringles that reciprocate in a gesture of condescension and piousness.
I want to pop the bastards in a hope that a high uptake of dopamine will caress the backs of my retinas and dribble on my optical nerves. Please stimulate me, that's all I ask. And then what? then.......what?
Why the fuck am i still here?
why the fuck am i still herE?
I imagine its because i haven't had a book published,
an essay revered or discussed on any sort of magnitude,
a poem read at a lecture,
or a piece of art gazed upon in inspiration or condemnation
I am here because i am selfish
and i want to live for as long as possible
for an otherwise insignificant reward.
Why the fuck am i still here?
i don't want to be forgotten
but inevitably
I will.
Poem : Perpetual piss
The 3 dimensional man stands hunched at the 3 dimensional lamp post
and ponders and ulterior existence to his own
where the 3 dimensional man is reduced to a silhouette
walking through himself when he staggers home.
His 3 dimensional bottle casts a 2 dimensional shadow
like a sullen projection of a cheap prostitute
casting a 2 dimensional composition with 2 dimensional stains
He lights his 3 dimensional cigarette
a combustible cylinder of futile presumptions
emitting 3 dimensional plumes of regret.
He finds himself stood
arched under the one dimensional sky
this figure of lines is transparent through light
passing through his perpendicular self
a four dimensional image of somebody else
who sleeps in piss
on the 2 dimensional concrete
where he thought he lost his head.
Poem : The day God wore a little dress
Mushrooms eclipsing neighbouring streets
Buildings and cars, commuters and
People exchanging dollars for newspapers or
Doughnuts exploding on shirt collars
Running for refuge in nearby corners, under coats, clothes
Reserving air from the smoke
As it seizes its immediate path, like dense liquid to a container
Submerging the nearest stranger
Through the red gossamer glow, hermetic and unmoved by events as
The lights turn nonchalantly from amber to green
“Did you see that plane?” one says
“Oh my god!” in repost
The cost of life is invaluable, insurmountable
As families crumble like steel
Now malleable and brittle under the searing scorn of that concrete New York sun
“Terrorist hijackers, what have they done?” Another asks disbelieving
Whilst watching panic flapping
Its arms where once was calm
The hot dog stall is unmanned and overturned
Bits of bodies with mustard in baps
“Where is God?” Another asks
As disassembled limbs slap on tarmac
“We’re under attack!”
Grey smog clings, unfettered, to any substance
Clouding vision but clarifying judgement, empirical
Whilst the world swirls with polka dots and striped socks
A girl in a dress is pulled from the rubble. A miracle,
To think she’s intact. “Here is God at last!” a woman shouts
With peace of mind that is otherwise in pieces, like imploded panes of glass.
But should I feel bad, for finding amusement through dusty internal organs?
For a miracle to have occurred, people would emerge
Unscathed from ground zero and
Brush the concrete from their clothes and go home.
The life of the girl I’ll take as a tonic,
But miracle it is not
Perhaps Allah is just as incompetent
Or maybe Our Father was being ironic.
Poem : Potatoes
Reduced to the privilege of analysis
enduring time and test to imagine
a conclusion that doesn't befit
a species with such a gift.
I sit enveloped in myself
entwined by yarn of nucleotides
with ambivalent meanderings
and twists
a catalyst for virulent ponderings
And Nietzsche said
magnificent ideas are conceived by walking
what sanctimony we're taught
alluding that thoughts
are inherently great.
So nearly were we all potatoes
earthly and somewhere
undiscovered diamonds of dirt
always with
one idea less
two chromosomes more
and a marvelous
silent retort.
Chrissie Macdonald
Chrissie Macdonald is an artist who 's 3D work elicits a sense of curiosity, which is inherently a positive, yet self indulgent trait. The perfect Euclidean geometry (unconcerned with hyperbolic and elliptic geometry) in her work is hastily positioned in its surroundings, and reverts to an imperfect state of being, which often looks unfinished and thus uncomfortable. This offers little if no comfort for the viewer.
Sol LeWitt
"Sol LeWitt is a minimalist by style and a conceptualist by inclination and faith. Between minimalism and conceptualism -- which in his work and in that of many other artists of his generation butted up against each other, overlapping to the point where they are by now often inseparable -- he created a new and a fresh art." -St. Luis Dispatch, David Bonetti, Visual Arts Critic 10.3.2004
As Sol Lewitt explained in his 'Paragraphs on Conceptual Art', that "art that is meant for the sensation of the eye primarily would be called perceptual rather than conceptual" (Lewitt,1967) which highlighted the dichotomous nature of the design/art practice, in that to create something visually appealing, the concept is rendered with partial unimportance.
"Since the function of conception and perception are contradictory (one pre, the other post fact) that artist would mitigate his idea by applying subjective judgement to it." (Ibid)
This, empirically, I have to agree with to some degree. However, the notion that 'percept' and 'concept' are separate, I feel, is of an absolutist, theoretical viewpoint. The work we are creating relies heavily upon the concept, but without the perception, it is of no value.
Dan Flavin
Created by an artist steeped in traditions of art and canons of Catholicism, Flavin's icons and fluorescent works offer nothing less than a reconsideration and deconstruction of art's past through both the systematic use of form and light and the tool of irony. Thus, he pits the transcendent aspirations of art against the practical commonality of the commercial light fixture, allowing neither to prevail." Michael Govan
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
Ellsworth Kelly
Importance of perception
"I,
know you appear,
vivid at my side,
denying you sprang out of my head,
claiming you feel,
love fiery enough to prove flesh real,
though it's quite clear,
all your beauty, all your wit, is a gift
my dear,
from me. "
For aphorisms to be expressed, for idyllic places of escapism to be idyllic places of escapism, for a chair to be a chair,
they must all be perceived, else they are nothing.
Some perceptions have a general rule of thumb, with exceptions that prove the trend. The majority of people from an urban environment would undoubtedly state their idyllic place of escapism as somewhere in moderate isolation.
Is it any wonder why people feel the most 'spiritual' when at the top of a mountain, or walking through a forrest or countryside? It is a theme replete in love poetry and other pieces of literature throughout history, for example Robert Frost's 'Reluctance';
"Out through the fields and woods,
and over the walls I have wended;
I have climbed the hills of view,
and looked at the world and descended."
Jon Keat's 'O Solitude!'
"Let it not be among the jumbled heap
Of murky buildings: climb with me the steep-
Nature's observatory, whence the dell,
In flowery slopes; its river's crystal swell"
And most forms of fiction and existentialist theory, non more so than Camus' 'The Myth of Sisyphus' where the example of the mountain is literally and allegorically implied as a perpetual sense of struggle and achievement.
Guy de Cointet
Kazimir Malevich and the Black Square
The Black Square is not quite as simple as it looks: even by taking art to degree zero as Malevich does here, he creates a stressed reading of figure that reads two ways, either a black square on top of a white ground or a black hole surrounded by a white border. Every object has a static facade and an inner dynamic." Supremitism
Much like Malevich's ideal of the square representing "a blissful sense of liberating non-objectivity...where nothing is real except feeling... and so feeling became the substance of life." suggests similar connotations with the black square symbolically conveying conformity.
For us the black square reflects the nature of modernity and the organisation of societies in that escapism is offered as a remedy, as opposed to societies providing a remedy for escapism.
The natural progression leads seamlessly onto the conflictual geometry of the triangle and its religious or 'spiritual' affiliations - a 'hyper-reality' to manufacture purpose and a craving for meaning.
In the works of Sartre and Heidegger, they describe FACTICITY as the relation to objects and events, as well as emotions respectively, in order to create a sense of identity. This leads to the split of the consciousness between objectivity and subjectivity, what Sartre coined the 'in-itself'and the 'for-itself'.
In a contradictory sense, Malevich is objectifying his 'non-objective' square by appropriating a definition upon it. The square must be 'felt' or firstly perceived as a square in order for it to be subjective, emotive. The very fact of calling it a square prompts the viewer to 'see' it thusly, and not to 'see' it as a hollow white square.
The FACTICITY of objects is often where feeling is derived. The 'fact' that I may like Liverpool over Manchester is only considered 'fact' as Manchester exists and the comparison can be made. The same can be said for the mass conformity of an idea (hegemony) that propels individuals to feel a need to 'escape'. One does not exist without the other.
The triangle exists within the square, one is the cause of the other and both are ironic.
Escapism is revered often in the from of religion, and on the basis of ill logic, whilst conformity works very much in a similar fashion, perpetuating the unhappiness that prompts the desire to escape.